Descartes' own demon hypothesis demonstrates that a being of sufficient power could systematically deceive even the most careful perceiver, undermining the clear/distinct distinction as a reliable limit on divine permission.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Clear and distinct(as the quality that real reason requires for Leibniz): A way of knowing something where you understand it completely and can see all its parts and how they connect—the opposite of vague or fuzzy understanding.
Demon hypothesis(the specific argument being referenced): A thought experiment where Descartes imagines an all-powerful evil demon that could trick him about everything he perceives, even his basic senses—used to test what we can actually trust knowing.
Descartes: # Descartes René Descartes was a French philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s who fundamentally changed how people think about knowledge and the mind. He's famous for the idea "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum), which means that the very fact that you can think proves you exist—a foundation for modern philosophy. He also invented the coordinate system used in mathematics (the x and y axes on a graph), which connects geometry and algebra in practical ways we still use today.
Systematically deceive(describing what the demon could do)

Based on where you are in your exploration