Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Descriptive deference to whatever linguists study conflat... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The scientific concept of language should be defined as a union of various ontological perspectives rather than by eliminating any single perspective

    Descriptive deference to whatever linguists study conflates the sociology of a discipline with its normative epistemology, committing a naturalistic fallacy about scientific methodology.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Conflate(the criticism being made in the statement)
    To mistakenly treat two different things as if they were the same thing.
    Descriptive deference(as used in philosophy of language)
    The act of deferring to or accepting what linguists actually describe about language, rather than questioning whether those descriptions are correct or complete.
    Normative epistemology(contrasted with descriptive claims in the statement)
    The study of how we *should* gain knowledge and what *should* count as valid ways of knowing—as opposed to just describing how people actually do it.
    Sociology of a discipline(contrasted with the discipline's standards for knowledge)
    The study of how a field of study (like linguistics) actually operates—who studies it, what methods they use, what they publish—as a social institution.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    naturalistic fallacy(G. E. Moore's term, introduced in 1903, applied to any attempt to reduce moral properties to naturalistically specifiable properties.)
    The error of supposing that a moral property is identical to some natural property, however that natural property might be specified.

    Connections

    2 topics

    All sources support it1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    The scientific concept of language should be defined as a union of various ontol...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective