Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Desert claims presuppose robust metaphysical free will, which hard determinists like Derk Pereboom argue is empirically undermined.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Desert can rest on compatibilist freedom: agents deserve blame when they act on their own desires and reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Neuroscientific evidence of prior brain activity doesn't prove consciousness plays no role in decision-making causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Practical accountability systems (justice, praise, blame) require only agent control over behavior, not metaphysical libertarianism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Neuroscience shows brain activity precedes conscious decisions, undermining the libertarian free will desert requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If all events follow from prior causes and physical laws, agents lack the control necessary to deserve praise or blame.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Desert judgments attribute moral responsibility presupposing agents could have acted otherwise—impossible under determinism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.