Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Dewey's account conflates the epistemic act of recognizin... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Deliberation assigns weights to prized qualities in the context of choice rather than taking those weights as given.

    Dewey's account conflates the epistemic act of recognizing a weight with the metaphysical status of that weight, which can be objective and prior to any particular deliberative episode.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Epistemic acts (recognizing) are mental events occurring at specific times; metaphysical facts (weights existing) are independent of when we acknowledge them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A weight's objective reality and causal powers exist prior to and independent of any agent's deliberative process about it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Conflating recognition with reality leads to problematic consequences: the same weight couldn't have different objective values before and after deliberation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.For Dewey, 'weight' is not a pre-existing metaphysical fact but emerges within the context of lived problematic situations and reflective inquiry.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between 'epistemic act' and 'metaphysical status' presupposes a mind-independent reality that Dewey's pragmatism deliberately challenges.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Calling this a 'conflation' misrepresents Dewey's position as category confusion rather than a coherent alternative epistemology-metaphysics relationship.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Conflates(in argumentation and logic)
    Treats two different things as if they're the same thing, or mixes them up in a way that causes confusion.
    Deliberative episode(contrasts with the weight existing independently of human thinking)
    A specific moment or period when someone sits down and thinks carefully through a problem or decision.
    Dewey(the philosopher whose ideas are being discussed)
    John Dewey was an American philosopher (1859-1952) who believed that philosophy should focus on real human experiences and solving practical problems, rather than abstract theories disconnected from life.
    Epistemic
    "Epistemic" relates to knowledge—how we know things, what counts as knowledge, and whether we can trust what we believe to be true. It comes from the Greek word for knowledge and is used to describe questions about the reliability and validity of our beliefs and understanding. For example, "epistemic humility" means acknowledging the limits of what you can actually know for certain.
    Metaphysical status(describing what's uncertain about possible worlds)
    The question of what something actually *is* or whether it really exists—is it physical, abstract, real, or just a useful fiction?
    Prior to(as used in philosophy)
    More fundamental or basic than; comes before in importance or logical order, not necessarily in time.
    objective(1910, §10)
    An ideal object, something like a state of affairs or proposition, which can be expressed by an independent sentence (e.g., 'Red is a color') when judged or assumed, or by a 'that'-clause or nominal phrase when judged about.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    A weight's objective reality and causal powers exist prior to and independent of...Calling this a 'conflation' misrepresents Dewey's position as category confusion...Conflating recognition with reality leads to problematic consequences: the same ...Deliberation assigns weights to prized qualities in the context of choice rather...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    Epistemic acts (recognizing) are mental events occurring at specific times; meta...For Dewey, 'weight' is not a pre-existing metaphysical fact but emerges within t...The distinction between 'epistemic act' and 'metaphysical status' presupposes a ...