Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Dewey's own naturalism commits him to rejecting any experience-type that cannot be grounded in a specific, identifiable biological or social function.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Aesthetic and contemplative experiences lack direct survival function yet Dewey values them—showing his actual view permits non-functional experiences.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The criterion 'identifiable function' is unfalsifiable; we can always retrospectively invent functions for any experience, making it vacuous.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Some experiences (dreams, grief, artistic vision) resist reduction to specific biological or social functions without remainder.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Dewey explicitly grounds experience in organism-environment interaction, requiring functional relevance for legitimacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Admitting non-functional experiences undermines naturalism by allowing explanatory gaps that transcend biological/social causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Evolution selects only experiences that enhance survival or social coordination, making non-functional experiences explanatorily suspect.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.