Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Dharmakīrti's theory of svalakṣaṇa holds that genuine causal efficacy (arthakriyāśakti) requires temporal succession, not co-presence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Physical causation (e.g., gravity between masses) appears simultaneous; denying co-presence causality excludes actual causal phenomena.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Temporal succession may mark causation's discovery, not its requirement; the causal relation itself could be metaphysically timeless.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Material constitution is simultaneous yet causal: parts causally compose wholes without temporal gap, challenging the necessity claim.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Causation requires a temporal gap: an effect cannot exist before its cause, so simultaneity logically precludes causal relations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Only successive states allow us to distinguish cause from effect; co-present entities are epistemically indistinguishable as causal relata.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Change itself is temporal: if cause and effect are simultaneous, neither undergoes transformation, contradicting the nature of causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.