Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Dialetheists like Graham Priest argue that some true cont... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Principle of Noncontradiction applies to all contingent truths as well as all necessary truths.

    Dialetheists like Graham Priest argue that some true contradictions exist, making PNC a revisable logical norm rather than an absolute constraint.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Self-referential statements like the liar's paradox seem genuinely true and false simultaneously, suggesting PNC fails for meaningful discourse.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Quantum mechanics shows particles exist in superposition states, implying reality itself may violate classical logical laws we impose on it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Revising PNC allows coherent treatment of borderline cases and semantic indeterminacy without ad-hoc exclusions or truth-value gaps.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.True contradictions make any statement derivable (explosion), rendering logical inference and rational discourse impossible and incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Paradoxes reflect language limitations, not reality; revising PNC confuses semantic problems with metaphysical truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Quantum superposition describes epistemic uncertainty, not ontological contradiction—particles don't violate PNC, our descriptions do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Paradoxes reflect language limitations, not reality; revising PNC confuses seman...Quantum mechanics shows particles exist in superposition states, implying realit...Quantum superposition describes epistemic uncertainty, not ontological contradic...Revising PNC allows coherent treatment of borderline cases and semantic indeterm...
    +3 moreShow less
    Self-referential statements like the liar's paradox seem genuinely true and fals...The Principle of Noncontradiction applies to all contingent truths as well as al...True contradictions make any statement derivable (explosion), rendering logical ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit