Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Different inference tasks and stakes call for different l... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A generalized bias-variance decomposition applicable to a variety of loss functions, including 0-1 loss, is available.

    Different inference tasks and stakes call for different loss functions.

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A generalized bias-variance decomposition applicable to a variety of loss functi...Domingos (2000) offers a generalization of the bias-variance decomposition that ...The standard decomposition is limited to squared loss.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Indirect inference is an important logical method69%Inductive inferences presuppose the Uniformity Principle69%Imperfect inferences fail (ST) but satisfy the combination of (TP) and...68%An inference consists of a set of judgments and a concluded judgment68%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: bounded-rationality
    View source passageHide passage
    Viewed from the perspective of the bias-variance trade-off, the ability to make accurate predictions from sparse data suggests that variance is the dominant source of error but that our cognitive system often manages to keep these errors within reasonable limits (Gigerenzer & Brighton 2009). Indeed, Gigerenzer and Brighton make a stronger argument, stating that “the bias-variance dilemma shows formally why a mind can be better off with an adaptive toolbox of biased, specialized heuristics” (

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective