Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Disparate treatment doctrine in U.S. employment law forbi... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Employers are legally prohibited from making hiring decisions based on statistical generalizations about protected groups, even when those generalizations are statistically sound.

    Disparate treatment doctrine in U.S. employment law forbids statistical discrimination against members of protected groups.

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentRights & Liberty

    Related

    An employer using group-level statistical evidence (e.g., that women or blacks a...Employers are legally prohibited from making hiring decisions based on statistic...The law requires hiring decisions to be based on particular evidence about indiv...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Disparate treatment of protected groups in hiring decisions is forbidd...86%Employers are legally prohibited from making hiring decisions based on...80%Using statistically sound group-level absenteeism data to exclude wome...79%An employer using group-level statistical evidence (e.g., that women o...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: equal-opportunity
    View source passageHide passage
    The disparate treatment of U.S. employment law forbids statistical discrimination against members of protected groups. For example, an employer might consider being prone to absenteeism a decisive disqualification for a particular job, and have sound statistical evidence that women (who might have caretaking responsibilities that prevent them from coming to work) and blacks (who must rely on unreliable public transportation to arrive at the work site) are more likely than white and Hispanic male

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective