Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Dispositional properties can remain unmanifested, so two creatures may share all dispositions yet differ in categorical bases underlying those dispositions.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If two creatures truly share all dispositions, there is no principled way to differentiate their categorical bases without additional evidence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Dispositions are grounded in categorical properties—claiming different bases without manifest differences violates explanatory parsimony.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Unmanifested dispositions become metaphysically idle if they produce no detectable difference, even in principle, from alternate bases.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Dispositions are defined by counterfactual conditionals (what would happen if triggered), not by actual manifestations occurring.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Silicon-based and carbon-based systems could have identical behavioral dispositions despite utterly different physical substrates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Multiple realizability in cognitive science shows mental dispositions can supervene on diverse neural architectures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42