Divine simplicity itself relies on the coherence of identity claims (God = His nature), but invoking a special mode of existence to explain this just postpones the problem rather than solving it.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

God = His nature(as used in philosophy of religion): The claim that God and God's fundamental characteristics (what makes God what God is) are literally one and the same thing, not two separate things.
Postpones the problem(as used in logical argumentation and problem-solving): Pushes the difficulty aside temporarily without actually resolving it; like solving a homework problem by moving it to tomorrow instead of actually answering it.
coherence(Applied uniformly by Bosanquet to both religious and non-religious truth claims.): The standard by which truth is assessed — a belief or system of beliefs is true insofar as it forms a consistent, internally unified whole.
divine simplicity(Central to both Malebranche's theodicy and his epistemology): A divine attribute functioning as a side constraint on God's actions, requiring God to act through simple means.

Based on where you are in your exploration