Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Drift does not allow one to quantify how much it contribu... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Drift is an evolutionary force, but a force of a different color from selection, mutation, and migration.

    Drift does not allow one to quantify how much it contributed to a change relative to selection, just as one cannot separate the contribution of a coin's fairness from the number of tosses when obtaining a particular result.

    CausationSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismCausation

    Key Terms

    Quantify(as used in scientific analysis)
    To measure something and express it as a number or amount.
    Selection(as the mechanism being applied across different domains)
    A process where certain traits or characteristics survive and spread because they work better than others, like how the strongest animals are more likely to survive and have offspring.
    drift(Forces debate in philosophy of evolutionary biology)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A process in population genetics associated with eliminating heterozygosity; on Brandon's view it is a law but not a force; on Filler's and Pence's views it qualifies as a force with stochastically specified direction

    Related

    Drift does not have a definite direction — it could yield an increase in any of ...Drift is an evolutionary force, but a force of a different color from selection,...Selection is deterministic in the sense that given trait frequencies and fitness...Selection, mutation, migration, and drift all play causal roles in evolutionary ...

    Similar

    Processes such as coin tosses and random genetic drift can be random o...72%Process should be distinguished from outcome when characterizing drift...72%Randomization is sufficient but not necessary to control selection bia...71%Fisher and Ford's conclusion that selection was occurring does not log...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: genetic-drift
    View source passageHide passage
    What, then, are the statisticalist issues that random drift is entangled with? The concerns raised by Walsh, Lewens, and Ariew (2002) and Matthen and Ariew (2002) have their origins in claims made by Sober (1984) in his classic The Nature of Selection. Sober characterizes evolutionary theory as a theory of forces, with its zero-force state described by the Hardy-Weinberg equation of population genetics (see the population genetics entry for an explanation of the equation); in such a state, the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective