Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Drift is not a defensible force in the causalmechanistic ... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Drift is not a defensible force in the causalmechanistic sense

    CausationPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Two similar populations subject to identical selective pressures can yield opposite outcomes (one fixing trait T, the other fixing trait T')
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The same setup explains both outcomes, just as the same coin-toss setup explains two heads in one series and four heads in another
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If the same causal setup explains divergent outcomes, no additional cause or force called 'drift' is needed
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageCausation

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    If the same causal setup explains divergent outcomes, no additional cause or for...The same setup explains both outcomes, just as the same coin-toss setup explains...Two similar populations subject to identical selective pressures can yield oppos...

    Similar

    Drift is a force79%Statistical error is not a causal force78%Drift is not a distinct kind of force separate from selection77%Conventions are not sufficient to determine illocutionary force77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: genetic-drift
    View source passageHide passage
    These metaphysical claims about drift (and selection and other evolutionary processes—but it is just drift that interests us here) set the stage for the statisticalists’ challenge. Matthen and Ariew (2002) challenge the claim that there is a defensible sense in which drift is a force. Aside from the fact that it does not have a predictable or constant direction (as Sober readily acknowledges), they point to a case of two similar populations subject to the same selective pressures, one in which t
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit