Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Each assessment — of the act and of the praising/blaming ... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Sanction utilitarianism enjoys no real advantage over act utilitarianism with respect to distinguishing praiseworthiness and blameworthiness

    Each assessment — of the act and of the praising/blaming — should be made by the utility of performing it

    ConsequentialismMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityConsequentialism

    Related

    It is therefore possible for an act to be wrong (suboptimal) yet blameless or ev...Sanction utilitarianism enjoys no real advantage over act utilitarianism with re...The direct utilitarian can appeal to the same distinctions among praiseworthines...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The direct utilitarian can distinguish between the moral assessment of an act an...

    Similar

    An act can be morally wrong yet blameless, or even praiseworthy77%Blameworthiness is determined by whether the act of blaming produces u...75%The direct utilitarian can distinguish between the moral assessment of...74%In assessing the culpability of risky conduct, good consequences that ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    However, the direct utilitarian can and should distinguish between the moral assessment of an act and the moral assessment of the act of praising or blaming that act. Each should be assessed, the direct utilitarian claims, by the utility of doing so. But then it is possible for there to be wrongdoing (a suboptimal act) that is blameless or even praiseworthy. But then the direct utilitarian can appeal to the same distinctions among praiseworthiness and blameworthiness that the sanction utilitaria

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective