Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Each of these three geometries is internally consistent a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The choice of conic κ determines which geometry — Euclidean, Lobachevskian, or elliptic — is realized by the resulting metric structure.

    Each of these three geometries is internally consistent and derivable from the projective construction.

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Different conics yield metric structures satisfying either Euclidean, Lobachevsk...Klein's distance function on region R is determined by the nature of the conic κ...The choice of conic κ determines which geometry — Euclidean, Lobachevskian, or e...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    There are many valid geometries, each of which must be internally cons...82%Alternative projective constructions yield equally coherent non-Euclid...76%Each geometry must be consistent.74%Metric properties of a geometry can be defined intrinsically using pro...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: geometry-19th
    View source passageHide passage
    Can metric properties be fixed in this way? Traditionally one defines the distance between two points (x1, … ,xn) and (y1, … ,yn) of a numerical manifold as the positive square root of (x1 − y1) 2 + … + (xn − y n)2. The group of isometries consists of the transformations that preserve this function. However, this is just a convention, adopted to ensure that the geometry is Euclidean. Using projective geometry, Klein thought of something better. No real-valued function of point pairs, defined on

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective