Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Earlier arguments attempted to show that coupling a class... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is no logical necessity to quantize the gravitational field.

    Earlier arguments attempted to show that coupling a classical gravitational field to quantum matter would allow violations of the uncertainty relations via measurements of the gravitational field.

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Key Terms

    Classical gravitational field(as used in physics and philosophy of physics)
    The way gravity works according to Newton's old theory—thinking of gravity as a smooth, continuous force rather than as individual particles or quantum packets.
    Coupling(as used in quantum mechanics)
    When two things become connected or interact with each other in a way that makes them influence one another.
    Quantum matter(as used in physics and philosophy of physics)
    Stuff at the smallest scales (atoms, electrons, photons) that behaves according to quantum mechanics, where particles can exist in multiple states at once and only become definite when measured.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Uncertainty relations(as used in physics and philosophy of science)
    Rules in quantum physics stating that you cannot know certain pairs of properties (like a particle's position and speed) with perfect precision at the same time—the more accurately you measure one, the less you can know about the other.
    Violations of the uncertainty relations(as used in physics and philosophy of physics)
    Finding a way to measure a particle's position and speed both precisely at the same time, which would break the fundamental rule that says this is impossible.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    All attempts to make this argument stick have so far failed.There is no logical necessity to quantize the gravitational field.

    Similar

    If the gravitational field remained classical while coupled to quantum...92%A classical gravitational field would not be constrained by the uncert...86%There is no logical necessity to quantize the gravitational field.73%CMC therefore stands as a viable route to quantum gravity71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: quantum-gravity
    View source passageHide passage
    In earlier research on quantum gravity it was often supposed that if there was at least one quantum field in the world together with the gravitational field, then given the universal coupling of the gravitational field, it must follow that the quantization of the one field somehow infects the gravitational field, implying that it must necessarily have quantum properties too. The arguments basically involve the consideration of a mass prepared in a superposition of position eigenstates. If the gr

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective