Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Economics' predictive failures are better addressed by Lakatosian progressive problem-shifts than by McCloskey's wholesale retreat to rhetorical analysis.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Lakatosian progressive shifts can rationalize endless ad-hoc modifications, making unfalsifiable theories appear scientifically legitimate indefinitely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.McCloskey rightly identifies that economic persuasion operates through rhetoric regardless; ignoring this just masks how knowledge actually gets accepted.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Economics' persistent predictive failures suggest the problem may be foundational assumptions, not methodology—neither framework adequately addresses this.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Lakatos's framework preserves economics' scientific identity by allowing theoretical evolution within a rational research program structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.McCloskey's rhetorical turn risks dissolving economics into literary criticism, abandoning empirical constraints that distinguish science from persuasion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Problem-shifts show how economics progresses despite failures—explaining anomalies through auxiliary hypotheses is how mature sciences develop.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.