Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Egalitarian redistribution through taxation requires comp... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Principles of equality and principles of self-ownership are in conflict and cannot both be upheld simultaneously.

    Egalitarian redistribution through taxation requires compelled contribution from the wealthy.

    ConsequentialismJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Principles of equality and principles of self-ownership are in conflict and cann...Self-ownership entails comprehensive entitlement to one's earnings without compe...These two requirements are mutually exclusive.

    Similar

    Welfare funded by taxation compels the wealthy to contribute their ear...87%Distributive justice requires significant redistribution of wealth amo...78%Egalitarian arrangements such as welfare funded by taxation are incomp...77%Wilt Chamberlain becomes wealthy, disrupting the formerly just distrib...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: property
    View source passageHide passage
    Still even if we concede that property is the product of social rules, and that normative thinking about the former must be preceded by normative thinking about the latter, there might be facts about the human condition or our agency as embodied beings that provide philosophical premises for an argument that property relations should be established in one way rather than another. Clearly, there is at least one material object with which a person does seem to have an intimate pre-legal relation t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective