Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Either alternative interpretations of causality must be d... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Either alternative interpretations of causality must be developed or causal language must be abandoned in the social sciences

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The covering-law model of causal explanation is fatally flawed in the social sciences
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Universal causal regularities among social phenomena are unavailable
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Related

    The covering-law model of causal explanation is fatally flawed in the social sci...Universal causal regularities among social phenomena are unavailable

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Berkeley re-interprets causality as a purported relation between ideas...82%Blocking transitivity departs from standard definitions of causality.81%Final causality is insufficient to explain the existence of substances...81%The Naiyāyika third clause blocks causal transitivity, suggesting the ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: history
    View source passageHide passage
    Analytic philosophers of history most commonly approached these issues on the basis of a theory of causation drawn from positivist philosophy of science. This theory is ultimately grounded in Humean assumptions about causation: that causation is nothing but constant conjunction. So analytic philosophers were drawn to the covering-law model of explanation, because it appeared to provide a basis for asserting historical causation. As noted above, this approach to causal explanation is fatally flaw
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit