Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Elements of music not amenable to music's original function, such as harmony, remain entirely legitimate
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
If music evolved functionally, structural elements that co-evolved with that function derive their normativity from it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Harmony in Western music co-evolved with communal and ritual sonic practices, making it functionally entangled, not incidental.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Elements that are functionally entangled cannot be declared legitimate independently of the original function without an alternative normative grounding.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Hanslick's formalism, the strongest defense of harmony's autonomy, was itself historically conditioned by 19th-century tonal practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A norm of legitimacy derived from historically contingent formalist aesthetics cannot serve as a universal, function-independent foundation for harmonic practice.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Spencer's explanation of music's origin is not a general theory of music's value
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Factual hypotheses regarding music's origin are separate from aesthetic norms
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.