Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Eliminative materialism (Churchland) denies folk psychological predicates track real mental kinds, dissolving the presupposition relation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Folk psychology successfully predicts and explains behavior across diverse contexts; explanatory success typically indicates reference to real phenomena, not false kinds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Even if neuroscience explains implementation, this doesn't eliminate higher-level mental kinds any more than chemistry's success eliminated biological kinds like 'organism'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Eliminativism undermines its own rational warrant: if thoughts aren't real mental states, what justifies believing the eliminativist's arguments are genuine thoughts?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Folk psychology's core terms (belief, desire, intention) lack precise definitions and vary across cultures, suggesting they don't map onto natural kinds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Neuroscience increasingly explains behavior through neural mechanisms without requiring folk psychological vocabulary, indicating these terms are explanatorily idle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Historical precedent (phlogiston, vital spirits) shows that commonsense ontologies are regularly eliminated when better theories emerge, not merely reduced.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.