Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Epicurus argues that stable, katastematic pleasures (like... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Immediate, particular pleasures are the end or goal of life, not pleasure in general or long-term pleasure.

    Epicurus argues that stable, katastematic pleasures (like ataraxia) are superior to kinetic pleasures precisely because they endure beyond the moment.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Pleasures that persist provide cumulative well-being over time, while momentary pleasures require constant renewal to maintain satisfaction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ataraxia eliminates the anxiety of anticipating pain or loss, creating a stable baseline of contentment that kinetic pleasures cannot match.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Enduring pleasures are rationally preferable because they're achievable through modest means, reducing dependence on external circumstances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The value of a pleasure may depend on its intensity and quality, not duration—a profound moment might outweigh prolonged mediocrity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Ataraxia as mere absence of pain lacks positive phenomenological content and may constitute a diminished rather than superior form of living.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim assumes pleasures are isolable units; but human flourishing likely requires dynamic engagement, not static equilibrium states.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    Ataraxia as mere absence of pain lacks positive phenomenological content and may...Ataraxia eliminates the anxiety of anticipating pain or loss, creating a stable ...Enduring pleasures are rationally preferable because they're achievable through ...Immediate, particular pleasures are the end or goal of life, not pleasure in gen...
    +3 moreShow less
    Pleasures that persist provide cumulative well-being over time, while momentary ...The claim assumes pleasures are isolable units; but human flourishing likely req...The value of a pleasure may depend on its intensity and quality, not duration—a ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit