Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Epicurus's symmetry argument establishes that the pre-natal and post-mortem states are relevantly identical: in neither does the person exist to be affected.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Pre-natal non-existence differs metaphysically from death: only death involves the termination of an existing person's life narrative.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Death can be bad comparatively (worse than continued life) even if not bad for the subject; pre-birth lacks this comparative harm.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We can rationally prefer longer lives to shorter ones without claiming death itself is experientially bad, avoiding Epicurus's problem.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Being harmed requires existing as a subject capable of experiencing negative states; pre-natal non-existence satisfies this criterion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If death is bad, it must be bad for someone; but the dead person cannot experience badness, making death's badness metaphysically obscure.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Asymmetrical attitudes toward pre-birth and post-death (regretting one but not the other) lack rational justification on Epicurus's view.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.