Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Epistemic authority over practical matters requires not just virtue but also publicly verifiable criteria, which the 'good person' standard lacks.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
All criteria purporting objectivity rest on prior value judgments; quantifiable metrics are no less contestable than virtue assessments.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Virtue includes practical wisdom (phronesis), which inherently involves contextual judgment—publicly verifiable criteria often miss crucial particulars.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
History shows credential systems become captured by interests; trustworthy character may better serve public good than formal procedural verification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Practical decisions affect others' lives, requiring accountability mechanisms that 'good person' judgments cannot provide due to their subjectivity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Public verifiability enables error-correction and institutional learning; virtue assessments lack systematic feedback loops for improvement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Moral disagreement persists among virtuous people, so virtue alone cannot justify why one good person's judgment should override another's.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.