Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Epistemic luck of this kind—where the hearer would believ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Testimony from a source whose reliability is unknown to the hearer does not put the hearer in a position to know the testified proposition.

    Epistemic luck of this kind—where the hearer would believe equally from an unreliable source—is precisely what Pritchard's anti-luck epistemology identifies as incompatible with knowledge.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Anti-luck epistemology(Pritchard's philosophical position)
    A theory of knowledge stating that you only truly know something if your belief isn't just a matter of luck—there must be a real connection between your reasoning and the truth.
    Incompatible with knowledge(describing the relationship between epistemic luck and knowledge)
    Cannot exist together with knowledge; if something has this quality, it prevents you from actually knowing something.
    Pritchard (Duncan Pritchard)(the philosopher whose theory is being referenced)
    A contemporary philosopher who developed the 'anti-luck epistemology' theory, arguing that knowledge requires more than just believing something true—it requires that your belief wasn't just lucky.
    epistemic luck(Used to distinguish mere true belief from genuine knowledge)
    The condition where a belief is true, but the truth is accidental — the believer could easily have held the same belief while being wrong

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    knowledge(Distinguished from mere true belief, which may be the product of indoctrination and need not exercise deliberative capacities.)
    Justified true belief — true belief that has been arrived at through the exercise of deliberative capacities, including comparison of and deliberation among alternatives.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Testimony from a source whose reliability is unknown to the hearer does not put ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective