Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Equal plausibility on both sides of a claim requires susp... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Traditional metaphysics should be rejected because it generates unresolvable contradictions and succumbs to Pyrrhonian skepticism.

    Equal plausibility on both sides of a claim requires suspension of judgment (Pyrrhonian skepticism).

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A discipline that requires suspension of judgment on its central claims cannot y...Traditional metaphysics attempts to transcend experience and healthy understandi...Traditional metaphysics should be rejected because it generates unresolvable con...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    When metaphysics transcends experience, it produces contradictions between its c...

    Similar

    Moral skepticism is a controversial position that requires justificati...80%Different forms of skepticism make different demands (certainty vs. fa...80%Radical skepticism that doubts the laws of logic or refuses all starti...78%Higher-order evidence calls for suspending judgment regarding the disp...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: herder
    View source passageHide passage
    Largely in the service of this ideal, Herder’s essay argues in favor of two sharp turns in philosophy, turns that would again remain fundamental throughout the rest of his career. The first turn consists in a rejection of traditional metaphysics, and closely follows an argument of Kant’s in Dreams of a Spirit Seer. Herder’s case is roughly this: (1) Traditional metaphysics, through undertaking to transcend experience (or strictly speaking, a little more broadly, “healthy understanding”, which in

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective