Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Equality of condition, if part of social justice, must reflect an appropriately limited conception of social responsibility.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
G.A. Cohen argues that social justice demands extend to personal choices and individual ethos, not merely institutional structures.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If justice pervades personal conduct, the scope of social responsibility is not pre-limited but determined by the demands of equality itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Rawls's difference principle conditions inequality on maximizing the position of the least advantaged, imposing no prior ceiling on redistributive demands.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The limits of social responsibility are therefore internal to egalitarian principles, not external constraints that precede and shape them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Social justice obligations of society are limited, not open-ended.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Any component of social justice must conform to the same limits that apply to social justice as a whole.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.