Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Equalizing utilities across the combined population also ... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Accepting all individuals with positive utility, accepting utility equalization, and avoiding the repugnant conclusion are jointly inconsistent.

    Equalizing utilities across the combined population also does not reduce social welfare.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Accepting all individuals with positive utility, accepting utility equalization,...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    If the added individuals are sufficiently numerous with sufficiently low utiliti...
    Starting from an affluent population, adding individuals with positive but near-...
    The resulting population is larger with arbitrarily lower utilities than the ini...

    Similar

    Starting from an affluent population, adding individuals with positive...85%Sum-utilitarianism aggregates utilities across all individuals to comp...79%Health contributes to overall utility or welfare74%A sufficiently large population with very low but positive utilities c...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: economic-justice
    View source passageHide passage
    A third development worth mentioning has to do with population ethics. Sum-utilitarianism appears to be overly populationist, since it implies the “repugnant conclusion” (Parfit 1984) that we should aim for an unhappy but sufficiently large population in preference to a small and happy one. Conversely, average utilitarianism is “Malthusian”, preferring a happier population, no matter how small, to a less happy one, no matter how large. Here again there is an interesting tension, namely, between

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective