Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Eschewing an incompletable project that constitutes one's... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It is prudent to eschew projects that cannot possibly be completed during the course of a normal lifetime.

    Eschewing an incompletable project that constitutes one's deepest categorical desire would undermine the very prudential self whose interests the advice purports to protect.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Personal identity is constituted by one's deepest categorical desires, not merely circumstantial preferences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Prudential advice that contradicts one's categorical identity structure removes the very self whose interests it aims to serve.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An incompletable project (like artistic pursuit) grounds meaning; abandoning it destabilizes rather than protects selfhood.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Prudential self-interest can require abandoning incompletable projects when they cause net harm to health, relationships, or flourishing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Categorical desires are often emotionally compelling but not necessarily constitutive of authentic identity or genuine interests.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates identity-constituting with identity-requiring; projects define us without making their pursuit always prudent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Afterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    An incompletable project (like artistic pursuit) grounds meaning; abandoning it ...Categorical desires are often emotionally compelling but not necessarily constit...It is prudent to eschew projects that cannot possibly be completed during the co...Personal identity is constituted by one's deepest categorical desires, not merel...
    +3 moreShow less
    Prudential advice that contradicts one's categorical identity structure removes ...Prudential self-interest can require abandoning incompletable projects when they...The claim conflates identity-constituting with identity-requiring; projects defi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit