Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Essentialism seems more warranted in chemistry, while Boy... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The search for a unitary theory of natural kinds applicable across all scientific disciplines is futile

    Essentialism seems more warranted in chemistry, while Boyd's HPC view seems more applicable in biology

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    A homogeneous theory of natural kinds that applies in all disciplines looks very...Some theories of natural kinds apply more readily to certain scientific discipli...The search for a unitary theory of natural kinds applicable across all scientifi...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    There are many different theories of natural kinds in the literature

    Similar

    Hume's epistemology is more cautious than Newton's scientific naturali...76%Brouwer's concept of function is less restrictive than Weyl's.76%PH is widely believed to differ from PSPACE75%Kreines (2008) argues Hegel's logical categories are relevant to the b...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: natural-kinds
    View source passageHide passage
    Recently, there has been a debate about the usefulness of natural kind classification in philosophy of science. Some philosophers have argued that the concept of natural kinds should be eliminated on the grounds that it does not play a useful role in scientific classification. David Ludwig (2018) and Ian Hacking (2007a) have argued for eliminating the concept of natural kind altogether. The arguments here are twofold: firstly, the concept of natural kind is applicable to a heterogeneous set of p

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective