Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Ethics and aesthetics are domains of normative activity — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There are universally binding norms in ethics and aesthetics

    Ethics and aesthetics are domains of normative activity

    AestheticsVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsVirtue Ethics

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedMoral Responsibility

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    Certain actions and emotions can be universally valid, which requires universall...Every domain of normative activity has a priori norms whose recognition is indis...There are universally binding norms in ethics and aesthetics

    Similar

    Every domain of normative activity has a priori norms whose recognitio...81%We can already account for aesthetic normativity using the notion of c...79%Latent aesthetic values exist in the most ordinary and routine objects...78%There are universally binding norms in ethics and aesthetics77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: neo-kantianism
    View source passageHide passage
    The defining claim of SW Neo-Kantianism is that there are universally valid norms, and every universally valid norm has an a priori ground.[19] The concept of the a priori is therefore not a psychological or biological notion (the a priori is not the innate), nor is it an anthropological notion (the a priori is not what is universally assented to). The a priori are norms, the recognition of which is indispensable for normative activities. In theoretical philosophy, the a priori are norms the r

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective