Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Evans and Bermúdez both argue that genuine perceptual systems must support object-demonstrative thought, enabling 'that object' reference across contexts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Purely sensorimotor tracking of spatiotemporal continuity can explain object persistence without requiring conceptual demonstrative thought.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim conflates perceptual systems' functional success with possession of conceptual capacities; these may be dissociable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Simple organisms with genuine perceptual systems (insects) show no evidence of context-independent object reference or demonstrative thought.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Animals with perceptual systems track individual objects over time and across viewpoints, suggesting capacity for object-demonstrative thought.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Without object-demonstrative reference, perceptual systems couldn't distinguish between re-encountering the same object versus a numerically distinct duplicate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Object-tracking in goal-directed behavior (predator following prey) requires the 'that object' cognitive capacity Evans and Bermúdez describe.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.