Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Even if P ⊊ BQP were proven, further empirical investigat... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Even if P ⊊ BQP were proven, further empirical investigation would be required to determine quantum computation's bearing on feasible computation or the Cobham-Edmonds thesis

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.BQP ⊆ PSPACE, but the relationship between BQP and NP is not well understood
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No polynomial-time quantum algorithms have been found for NP-complete problems on widely accepted quantum computation models
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.There is considerable controversy about whether physical realizations of quantum computation models can be built robustly enough to solve problems unsolvable classically
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    BQP ⊆ PSPACE, but the relationship between BQP and NP is not well understoodNo polynomial-time quantum algorithms have been found for NP-complete problems o...There is considerable controversy about whether physical realizations of quantum...

    Similar

    A proof that P is strictly contained in BQP would not alone determine ...82%Even a proof that P is properly contained in BQP would not settle the ...82%There is considerable controversy about whether physical realizations ...81%Empirical investigation beyond the theoretical proof would still be re...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    Among these are Grover’s algorithm (Grover 1996) for searching an unsorted database (which runs in time \(O(n^{1/2})\), whereas the best possible classical algorithm is \(O(n)\)) and Shor’s algorithm (Shor 1999) for integer factorization (which runs in \(O(\log_2(n)^3)\), whereas the best known classical algorithm is \(O(2^{\log_2(\log_2(n))^{1/3})}\)). Since it can be shown that quantum models can simulate models such as the classical Turing machine, \(\textbf{BQP}\) contains \(\textbf{P}\) and
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit