Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Even within Tendai exegesis, Annen's defense of grass-and-tree buddhahood remained polemically contested and was not accepted as orthodox Mahāyāna doctrine.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Annen's theory developed logically from Tendai hongaku thought; rejecting it required explicit counter-arguments.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Some Tendai lineages preserved Annen's teachings, suggesting 'rejected' overstates the degree of consensus against it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Calling heterodox positions 'contested' is expected; contestation doesn't prove they lacked serious philosophical merit.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Annen's position contradicted established Mahāyāna commentarial consensus on Buddha-nature's restriction to sentient beings.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Later Tendai schools largely abandoned grass-and-tree buddhahood, suggesting it lacked sufficient doctrinal grounding.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Even sympathetic Tendai scholars disputed Annen's specific arguments, indicating internal doctrinal instability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.