Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Event theories of sound are false — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Event theories of sound are false

    PerceptionPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Event theories claim that sounds are identical to environmental events or to parts of environmental events
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.It is possible to hear a sound without the occurrence of an environmental event (the existence premise)
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If sounds could exist without environmental events, sounds cannot be identical to environmental events or parts thereof
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguagePerception

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Event theories claim that sounds are identical to environmental events or to par...If sounds could exist without environmental events, sounds cannot be identical t...It is possible to hear a sound without the occurrence of an environmental event ...

    Similar

    Event theories must classify experiences of echoes and recorded sounds...81%The premise that sound can be heard in the absence of an environmental...79%Event theories claim that sounds are identical to environmental events...79%Kulvicki's dispositional theory cannot account for the intuition that ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: sounds
    View source passageHide passage
    Nudds (2018) challenges both event theories by virtue of “the argument from the medium” which is elaborated to show that environmental events are not the bearers of acoustic features (2018: 54). The main premise of the argument, the existence premise, states that we can hear a sound without the occurrence of an environmental event. This premise can be used against both event theories, which claim that sounds are either identical to environmental events or to parts of such events (2018: 67). Nudd
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit