Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Every being whose existence is merely possible requires an external cause to actualize it, as al-Kindi and later Avicenna maintained.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The distinction between 'possible' and 'necessary' may be epistemic, not metaphysical; all existence might be brute fact.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Why must an actualizer exist necessarily? Perhaps all beings are contingent, making the premise's conclusion circular.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Quantum indeterminacy suggests some events lack external causes, undermining the universal causal principle assumed here.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Possible beings lack necessity; without external causation, there's no explanation for why they exist rather than not.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An infinite regress of dependent causes is explanatorily unsatisfying; a necessary being must ground the chain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Possibility and actuality are metaphysically distinct; transition between them requires an external actualizing agent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.