Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Every form is numerically distinct from the form of which... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→An infinite regress of forms follows from the assumption that every form is numerically distinct from the form of which it is the intentional object.

    Every form is numerically distinct from the form of which it is the intentional object.

    Modality & PossibilityPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityModality & Possibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    2 linked

    Related

    An infinite regress of forms follows from the assumption that every form is nume...If every form is a thought, then every form is a thought of a form.Non-Identity holds: a form is not identical to the things that participate in it...Self-Predication holds: each form predicates itself.

    Similar

    Non-Identity: if one form partakes of another, the two forms are numer...85%Non-Identity entails that each new form is numerically distinct from a...82%Therefore, L2 is numerically distinct from L1.82%Non-Identity: L3 is numerically distinct from both L1 and L2.82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: plato-parmenides
    View source passageHide passage
    Parmenides’ first argument appears to have the following structure. First, all thoughts have intentional objects: every thought is of something rather than nothing. Second, the object of any thought T is something that T thinks to be one over all the instances. But anything that is thought to be one over all the instances is a form. Parmenides concludes that the intentional object of every thought is a form, and hence if every form is a thought then every form is a thought of a form. Although Pa

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective