Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Every sentence of L is already a sentence of H in this si... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A learner whose hypothesis H generates all of L and more cannot use the primary linguistic data to discover her error.

    Every sentence of L is already a sentence of H in this situation.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A learner whose hypothesis H generates all of L and more cannot use the primary ...Identifying sentences of H that are not sentences of L requires negative evidenc...Negative evidence is held to be unavailable to language learners.To shrink H, the learner would need to know which sentences of H are not sentenc...

    Similar

    The sentence 'Barack Obama is a Democrat' is true and 'Barack Obama is...82%The question at issue is whether utterances of (P) literally say the s...80%Therefore, 'Superman' and 'Clark Kent' differ in sense.79%The Sinn of 'Hesperus' differs from the Sinn of 'Phosphorus'79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: innateness-language
    View source passageHide passage
    Take a child learning the grammar of her language, L. Figure 2 represents the 5 possible relations that might obtain between the language generated by her current hypothesis, H, and that generated by the target grammar, L. (v) represents the end point of the learning process: the learner has figured out the correct grammar for her language. A learner in situation (i), (ii) or (iii) is in good shape, for she can easily use the pld as a basis for correcting her hypothesis as follows: wheneve

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective