Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Everything that moves is a body
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Immaterial souls or intellects, as posited by Neoplatonists and Aristotle, can initiate motion without themselves being bodies.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Aristotle's Unmoved Mover causes celestial motion yet is explicitly non-corporeal, demonstrating mover and body are separable categories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The supporting syllogism's fourth premise illicitly assumes all moving things reduce to animals, plants, or minerals, committing a false dichotomy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Celestial spheres in Ptolemaic-Aristotelian cosmology are moved by incorporeal Intelligences, which are neither animal, plant, nor mineral.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Every animal is a body
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Every plant is a body
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Every mineral is a body
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Show 1 more premise
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.