Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Evidence is revealed exclusively in present experience. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is no absolute truth as postulated by either dogmatism or skepticism.

    Evidence is revealed exclusively in present experience.

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Skepticism2 linkedPhilosophy of Language

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    1 linked

    Related

    There is no absolute truth as postulated by either dogmatism or skepticism.Truth defines itself in process, as revision, correction, and self-surpassing.Truth is always and exclusively tested in present experience, as one cannot reli...Truth is defined as lived experience of truth — that is, evidence.

    Similar

    Truth is always and exclusively tested in present experience, as one c...81%Perceiving the present and perceiving something as present are distinc...77%The present of experience is temporally extended and concerns the past...76%Nonconceptual perception ultimately discloses only fleeting particular...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: gasset
    View source passageHide passage
    Our discussion thus far makes manifest Ortega’s ambivalence toward phenomenology. After he learned of Husserl’s Crisis of European Sciences, Ortega did not argue that his later general position and that of phenomenology were “diametrically opposed”. Indeed, in a long footnote at the conclusion of Notes on Thinking, Ortega invited a comparison between himself and Husserl. In 1935, Husserl presented a series of four lectures in Prague on “Philosophy in the Crisis of European Mankind”, all of which

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective