Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Excluding agents from moral freedom entirely based on diminished rationality conflates impaired agency with the complete absence of agency.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The claim equivocates 'moral freedom' with 'some moral agency'; these are distinct—agents might retain limited agency while lacking full moral freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Rationality is not merely one factor among many; it's constitutive of the kind of deliberative agency required for genuine moral freedom and accountability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Protecting vulnerable agents by limiting their moral freedom in certain contexts doesn't conflate impairment with absence—it reflects graduated responsibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Agency exists on a spectrum; diminished rationality reduces but doesn't eliminate an agent's capacity for intentional action and preference expression.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral responsibility requires some threshold of agency, not perfect rationality; many morally responsible adults have significant cognitive limitations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Excluding agents entirely from moral freedom based on one cognitive deficit ignores their abilities in other domains and denies their autonomy unnecessarily.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.