Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Existence and nonexistence (and their combinations) are t... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The ultimate truth cannot be described linguistically or conceptually.

    Existence and nonexistence (and their combinations) are the only possible ways of speaking of or conceptualizing the status of the existence of things.

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    The tetralemma negates all four extremes: existence, nonexistence, both existenc...The ultimate truth cannot be described linguistically or conceptually.When all possible modes of description are negated, what is being described cann...

    Similar

    Existence and nonexistence exhaust the available linguistic and concep...90%If the nonexistence of everything is impossible, then necessarily some...88%The concept of nonexistence cannot be affirmed independently once the ...87%Things cannot be nonexistent unless they stand in contrast to things t...86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: gorampa
    View source passageHide passage
    In other words, because all four extremes are negated under the analysis of the tetralemma, Gorampa concludes that a correct realization of the ultimate truth must be something that is other than these conceptualizations of and dichotomizations into existence and nonexistence. As such, the ultimate truth cannot be described using these terms. And, since these are the only possible ways of speaking of or conceptualizing the status of the existence of things, once they are all negated, one is forc

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective