Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Existence is a precondition for any state, including moral degradation — a being cannot lose goodness without first persisting as an existent subject.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Moral degradation may apply to potential or counterfactual entities; something need not actually exist to be morally evaluable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Existence and moral status are distinct categories; an entity could lose moral standing without ceasing to exist as a physical entity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The claim conflates ontological and moral frameworks; existence as a physical fact does not determine moral property instantiation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral properties logically require a substrate—a subject must exist to instantiate any moral state, including degradation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Temporal continuity of identity is necessary for moral change; degradation implies a being persists through loss of goodness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Non-existent entities cannot satisfy the conditions for moral predicates, making existence a necessary precondition for all moral states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.