Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Existence is not a real predicate that adds to the concept of a thing, but merely posits the subject with all its predicates (Kant, Critique of Pure Reason).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Existence appears functionally different from non-existence in measurable ways (causal powers, spatiotemporal location), suggesting real distinction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If existence is never predicated, we cannot explain why 'unicorns exist' differs meaningfully from 'unicorns do not exist' logically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Modern quantified logic treats existence claims as genuine predicates; rejecting this undermines standard logical analysis of existential statements.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Existence adds nothing to a concept's content: a hundred real dollars have identical properties to a hundred imagined dollars.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If existence were a predicate, we could meaningfully ask whether things with all other predicates actually exist—but this seems circular.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Existence merely instantiates a concept in reality rather than enriching the concept itself logically or semantically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.