Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Experimental philosophy research (Nichols, Nahmias) reveals that folk intuitions about responsibility are sensitive to framing and are therefore unreliable as a normative standard.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Framing sensitivity doesn't prove unreliability—it may reveal how context legitimately affects responsibility ascriptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Experimental subjects' brief responses under artificial conditions may poorly represent reflective folk judgment about responsibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Even if intuitions are framing-sensitive, this doesn't establish they lack normative force—facts themselves can be context-dependent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Framing effects demonstrate systematic cognitive biases that distort judgment independent of underlying moral facts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If folk intuitions conflict depending on presentation, at least one set cannot track moral reality reliably.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Normative standards require stable principles; intuitions that fluctuate with framing fail this requirement.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42