Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Explosion (ex contradictione quodlibet) is a structural f... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Dialetheism is true.

    Explosion (ex contradictione quodlibet) is a structural feature of classical logic: accepting any true contradiction trivializes all inference.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.In classical logic, from a contradiction (P ∧ ¬P), any proposition Q follows by the principle of disjunctive syllogism and weakening.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If contradictions were tolerated without trivialization, classical logic's inference rules would become unreliable for all reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Explosion preserves classical logic's consistency: one contradiction would collapse the entire system unless rejected outright.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Paraconsistent logics tolerate contradictions without explosion, yet maintain non-trivial inference through restricted logical operators.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Real scientific and legal reasoning often work within contradictory premises without treating all conclusions as equally valid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Explosion describes classical logic's structure, not an inherent feature of reasoning itself; alternative structures avoid trivialization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked
    Dialetheism is true.

    Related

    Dialetheism is true.Explosion describes classical logic's structure, not an inherent feature of reas...Explosion preserves classical logic's consistency: one contradiction would colla...If contradictions were tolerated without trivialization, classical logic's infer...
    +3 moreShow less
    In classical logic, from a contradiction (P ∧ ¬P), any proposition Q follows by ...Paraconsistent logics tolerate contradictions without explosion, yet maintain no...Real scientific and legal reasoning often work within contradictory premises wit...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit