Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Expressing grief at circumstances differs logically from denying providential governance; one can affirm God's order while mourning one's place within it.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Persistent grief at one's circumstances implies practical rejection of their necessity; acceptance and mourning pull in opposite directions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God's order is truly providential, mourning it expresses implicit judgment that the order is deficient or unjust.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between affirming governance and resenting one's place collapses when one's place is part of that governance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Emotional responses and rational assent operate in different mental domains; grief is affective while belief is cognitive.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Accepting an order as divinely ordained doesn't require endorsing every feature of it; one can affirm the system while lamenting particular outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Historical religious traditions distinguish between submission to providence and lament as compatible practices (Psalms, Job).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.