Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Extending soteriological potential to grasses and land conflates ontological participation in suchness with the distinct capacity for liberation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Some Buddhist traditions teach that all sentient beings possess Buddha-nature; grasses may possess subtle sentience or proto-consciousness we cannot currently detect.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The distinction between 'participation in suchness' and 'capacity for liberation' may itself be a dualistic construct that obscures non-dual reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Liberation might not require intentional striving but rather removal of delusion; this is possible for any entity with any form of existence or awareness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Liberation requires volitional agency and intentional striving; grasses lack the cognitive capacities necessary for soteriological transformation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Participating in being (suchness) is metaphysically universal; soteriological potential requires specific moral and epistemic capacities that are categorically distinct.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Confusing ontological status with soteriological capacity dissolves meaningful ethical distinctions and renders liberation conceptually incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.