Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Externalist theories of aesthetic experience have become dominant since the mid-20th century
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Phenomenological accounts of aesthetic experience (Merleau-Ponty, Ingarden) remain actively defended and constitute a robust internalist tradition through the late 20th century.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The continued influence of Kant's internalist framework on contemporary aesthetics (e.g., Guyer, Allison) demonstrates that internalism was never displaced as dominant.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Beardsley's later work (1982) retains a phenomenological core focused on the subject's felt unity of experience, making its classification as 'externalist' contestable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the externalist/internalist boundary is drawn differently than the argument assumes, the historical narrative of externalist dominance collapses into a taxonomic artifact rather than a substantive philosophical shift.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Internalist theories predominated during the early and middle parts of the 20th century
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Externalist theories, including those of Beardsley (1982) and Dickie (1988), have been in the ascendance since then
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.