Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    FDS, as a psychologically distinct subject with her own e... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The wishes of EAS expressed in her advance directive ought to control decisions about FDS's life, even at the cost of FDS's good.

    FDS, as a psychologically distinct subject with her own experiential states, possesses the morally relevant properties that ground welfare rights regardless of her R-relation to EAS.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Sentience and capacity for subjective experience are sufficient grounds for welfare rights, independent of relational properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.FDS's distinct neural/cognitive states constitute morally relevant properties that generate direct claims on others' consideration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Grounding rights in R-relations creates problematic dependency: welfare becomes contingent on external facts rather than intrinsic capacities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Welfare rights may require both intrinsic properties AND appropriate relational context to generate enforceable moral obligations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Identity and moral status in certain frameworks depend constitutively on relations; FDS's status may be partially relational, not purely intrinsic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Claiming R-independence requires justification: why should isolated sentience generate welfare rights without uptake by moral community or agent?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Experiential states(in philosophy of mind and ethics)
    What someone is actually feeling or experiencing at this moment, like pleasure, fear, or satisfaction.
    FDS and EAS(used as stand-ins for the beings whose moral status is being debated)
    Abbreviations or names for specific individuals or cases used in a philosophical argument (their full meanings depend on the original source).
    R-relation(logic and metaphysics)
    A technical way of describing a relationship or connection between things, where 'R' is a placeholder for whatever specific relationship is being discussed.
    ground (verb, philosophical sense)(used here to mean that certain properties are the foundation for why welfare rights should exist)
    To be the fundamental reason or basis for something; to explain why something is true or exists.
    morally relevant properties(used in ethics to explain what gives something moral importance)
    Characteristics or qualities of a being that matter ethically—meaning they're reasons why we should care about what happens to that being.
    psychologically distinct subject(used in ethics to identify who or what counts as having moral importance)
    A being with its own individual mind, thoughts, and inner experiences that are separate from other beings' minds.
    welfare rights(political philosophy; used analogically to argue for organ redistribution)
    Rights that entitle people to resources, which the state may fulfill through coercive redistribution from those with a surplus to those with little

    Connections

    2 topics

    Personal Identity1 linkedBioethics1 linked

    Related

    Claiming R-independence requires justification: why should isolated sentience ge...FDS's distinct neural/cognitive states constitute morally relevant properties th...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Grounding rights in R-relations creates problematic dependency: welfare becomes ...
    Identity and moral status in certain frameworks depend constitutively on relatio...
    +3 moreShow less
    Sentience and capacity for subjective experience are sufficient grounds for welf...The wishes of EAS expressed in her advance directive ought to control decisions ...Welfare rights may require both intrinsic properties AND appropriate relational ...